Rollercoaster of Love
Keith's salute to inefficiency only contributes to my increasingly vexed feelings about the modern university (and my place in it). I cannot tell whether a university is a place where good intentions have been severely compromised by encroaching Taylorist standards of "productivity" or whether it is a place where "real world" standards have not encroached enough. (The third possibility is, of course, that a substantial percent of human beings anywhere are narrow-minded bastards.) Anyhow, my position at the U is an invented one--no home campus, no single research interest, unusual authority in some matters while all but invisible in others. I am the Ariel of this strange island, slipping unnoticed into affairs of (wo)men who may be kings and may be beasts. I am currently going through the usual review process--formal committee members are watching me teach, scouring my cv, and reading my publication offerings--so I may be a bit more sensitive than usual. But because of my unusual position, I spend most days of most weeks prying into others' courses and peering through the holes of our administrative structures. And, oh!, what I have begun to see. A blog is not the best place to get into details, but I will say that I am experiencing the thrill and disappointment of political maneuvering that I have not felt since Valmont betrayed me just as I was about to conquer the world. My training--an idealistic, bookish college mixed with a ruthless but no less idealistic grad school--leaves me wearing Mambrino's helmet, arming myself for contests I cannot win. But, still, I admit to enjoying the visits, emails, and conversations with those who walk with me in the naïve hope that we're actually helping people.
I want to say more. Stay tuned. But I have to get back to preparing the seminar I'm giving tomorrow morning for high school teachers. It's called "The Surprising Truth about University Writing." Who knew that my adult life would be so glamorous?
Blognote: Stupid blog software dumped this post after I had finished it, so I rewrote as best I could (very quickly). Beware the "Preview" function. Save first. (Sounds obvious now.)

3 Comments:
I don't know who this "Valmont" character is, but he sounds shady. I would never do such a thing.
-ValBERT
In praise of efficiency -
I think I'm outside the 3T pack on this one: I like fast. Fast songs (the Misfits not Galaxie 500). Short conversations. Flipping through the channels.
This is most pronounced at work: I don't like small talk, I don't like people who use my time to articulate something they could have worked out on their own, and I don't like anyone coming to me with a question without also having a solution.
The staff here is way too small for the office bureaucracy Gaston describes (note I said office bureaucracy not office politics - which I do not care for, and certainly have several rants stored in me about THAT), but I think the slowness GL describes would drive me crazy. Props to anyone who can thrive in that kind of challenging environment.
There are glacial elements in academia, for sure. But I'm more focused on the productivity angle, which is very fast. So much text and so much speech must be produced quickly and without pause. I wish I had a slow period to actually build up something to say.
And I do mean politics. What is at stake is how the institution runs and who runs it. Various factions gather around various leaders and poke at the other factions.
Post a Comment
<< Home